Sandy Berger

Originally posted - Monday, April 02, 2007

This story is absolutely incredible. Do you even know who Sandy Berger is? Probably half the people that read this will not know who he is (like I didn't), but I guarantee you if he were a Republican, you would know him. He is the former NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR to Bill Clinton. I'm going to offer a summary of what happened, but if you have time, try the link below titled "World Net Daily" because it explains all the details and just how far this goes.

Here is what happened. Around 1999-2000 while Clinton was still President there was a terrorist plot on the USS Sullivans in Yemen and the Los Angeles airport. Yeah, I asked the same question...why didn't any of us know about that? Apparently, the government "thwarted" the terrorists (as Berger testified before the 9/11 Commission). This isn't true. Ahmed Ressam was discovered to be in possession of nitroglycerin while trying to enter the US through the Canadian border. A border patrol agent was suspicious and checked the guy out. The Clinton administration didn't say, hey go check out this dude. An American did her job. At Ahmed Ressam's trial, he revealed that he was trained in Bin Laden's terror camps in Afghanistan. As for the bombing of our ship, that failed because the terrorists put so many bombs on their ship that it sank. They were going to try to do what they did to the US Cole (send a little boat with bombs right into the side of the ship). Yeah, Clinton nailed them!

(I wrote a ton at this point and of course myspace messed up and I lost it all...another reason why I'm beginning to hate myspace). Anyway, now you're going to get the really short story:

Basically, Berger went into the national archives and stole top secret documents...documents that were essential to the 9/11 Commission's duties. He stuffed them in his socks. These he took out, presumably, to alter and then replace. He made repeated visits to the bathroom (to flush papers that were altering wouldn't do the trick) while he was supposed to be looking at top secret reports. Some of these documents pertained to the Millennium plot in LA. They basically showed the fault of the Clinton Administration. When the new administration came in, they weren't briefed on this missing Millennium plot report and it's suggestions. WorldNetDaily reports, "Ashcroft said the "highly-classified" review "was not among the 30 items upon which my predecessor [Janet Reno] briefed me during the transition."

I've never been a blame anybody guy on the 9/11 attacks whether that be Clinton or Bush. However, after hearing about Berger, you have to wonder what Clinton is responsible for? If Berger was scared enough to go flushing and altering ultra top secret papers, then don't you think there was a reason he wanted the evidence destroyed? To use a double negative, people don't hide what doesn't need to be hidden. You don't risk jail time (which destroying those papers would result in) because you have a paper fetish. There was something Clinton and his administration didn't want out because of its implications.

2007 - World Net Daily - http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=39544

2007- Latest Fox News - http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,262687,00.html

2004 - Fox News article from when this story first broke http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,126428,00.html