Globalism, Part 1: A brief overview of the NWO and the NAM

There is a difference between the NWO and the New Age Movement (hereafter, NAM). The NWO is a political term. It is the global unification of the world. Basically, it is a one-world government. This means a unification of laws, trade, rights, authority, etc. The NAM is much more spiritual. It is, in a sense, the religious division of the NWO. Both movements are about unity, but one is physical and one is spiritual. It is imperative to understand that there is a difference yet, more importantly, a unity between the two.

In an address to the nation, George Bush Sr. announced that all the issues facing the world required a “New World Order.” We need this to help with issues such as famine, natural disasters, global warming, nuclear holocaust, genocide, WW3, terrorism—essentially, peace. Peace is the new God. I’m sure you’ve heard the phrase “unity within diversity.” This slogan of tolerance is the sime qua nom (“not without which,” meaning it is the foundation) of the NWO. “If we can just unite everyone around a single goal, then we can accomplish anything.” According to this movement, humanity wants peace and if you don’t follow their narrow requirements for peace, then you’re a terrorist. Every religion is supposed to unite under this banner of peace to pray. All religions are equal, and all pray to the same God. We just manifest, due to culture, differing ways. These different ways are to be celebrated because this is “unity within diversity.” Pope John Paul II called for “New International Order”. Pope Benedict called for the NWO as well. He is quoted to say, “A united humanity will be able to confront the many troubling problems of the present time: from the menace of terrorism to the humiliating poverty in which millions of human beings live, from the proliferation of weapons to the pandemics and the environmental destruction which threatens the future of our planet.” [I wrote this part about 3 or 4 weeks ago and the link for where I got this quote (yahoo news) has been changed. So sorry, I just used a quote that I can no longer cite. Good thing this isn't a paper!]